Fidelity Labs managing partner Parth Gargava says bitcoin may be moving away from its familiar four-year split rhythm toward something closer to a “supercycle,” a regime that could keep prices high for longer and make declines less severe if structural demand continues to rise.

Speaking in a Jan. 9 Fidelity video on cryptocurrency forecasts for 2026, Gargava anchored the discussion in a cycle that many market participants have used for years: peaks occur roughly a year and a half after each halving. “Traditionally, we have seen Bitcoin have this four-year cycle,” he said, adding that this pattern is “strongly correlated with Bitcoin halving events.” He pointed to the 2016 halving followed by a December 2017 peak near $20,000, and the 2020 halving followed by another peak in 2021 about 18 months later.

This story matters because it frames the debate surrounding the latest halving in April 2024. Gargava acknowledged that some investors are drawing straightforward conclusions from past cycles: “So maybe we’ve passed that peak price.” However, he presented this view only as one side of the argument, emphasizing the competing thesis that market structure is evolving.

“On the other hand, you also see a lot of arguments about how we could enter a supercycle, unlike what we have seen in the last four years,” Gargava said. “And what a supercycle really means is that you can have longer highs, longer highs and shallower lows.”

Gargava acknowledged that Fidelity Digital Assets’ research team described what he called a “supercycle mechanism” and suggested an analogy to the commodities market in the 2000s. The key issue was not that Bitcoin would mechanically copy commodities, but that a sustained, multi-year offer could change the behavior of markets, extending the expansion and reducing the depth of the sell-off.

JUST IN: $5 Trillion Fidelity talks about how to do it #Bitcoin could enter a “supercycle”

Bullish 🚀 pic.twitter.com/IUv3GVHwEW

— Bitcoin Magazine (@BitcoinMagazine) January 12, 2026

Three forces that could push Bitcoin into a supercycle

He outlined three factors that he believed could underpin this type of regime change.

The first is “steady buying by ETF-focused institutions,” which Gargava described as sustained demand rather than episodic bursts of speculation. He says ETFs can act as a conduit to keep additional capital flowing even when sentiment deteriorates, potentially altering the market’s typical post-peak period.

Secondly, politics. Gargava pointed to “pro-crypto policies” in the U.S. as a supportive backdrop, suggesting that a friendlier regulatory stance could reduce major risks and encourage broader participation from investors and intermediaries who previously remained on the sidelines.

The third is market maturation and changing correlations. “We also see the cryptocurrency market as a whole maturing and moving away from the S&P 500 and precious metals,” he said. The implication of this is that Bitcoin’s trading behavior may become less and less reliant on conventional risky asset moves and a straightforward “digital gold” narrative, which could have implications for positioning, hedging and macroeconomic sensitivity.

It is worth noting that Gargava did not claim that the four-year cycle had been definitively broken. Instead, he presented a timely question for 2026: whether bitcoin continues on a post-halving path culminating in a familiar, edged boom-and-bust pattern, or whether structural forces: ETF-driven institutional demand, a more supportive U.S. policy tone and a maturing market profile support a longer, more stable expansion with “shallower declines.”

At the time of publication, Bitcoin was trading at $92,182.

Featured image created with DALL.E, chart from TradingView.com